“I see a Bureau of Buildings and a Department of Planning elevating unrestricted development above all other considerations, including adherence to law.” -- Tom CoffinTom’s statement above is made in regard to his most recent analysis of the appeals that were heard during 2008, the full text which can be found below. Not surprisingly, 5 of the 7 appeals still outstanding at the time of Tom’s firing were subsequently withdrawn or deferred/dismissed; whereas only 2 of the 16 appeals filed against Tom’s decisions prior to his firing were withdrawn or deferred/dismissed.
As Tom explains, withdrawals typically occur when the appellant and the city arborist resolve their differences prior to the hearing whereas a deferral/dismissal means the case was deferred or dismissed without a ruling by the commission. The fact that the majority of Tom’s appeals were never heard before the Tree Commission after his firing raises doubts as to how well the city arborists are adhering to the law.
Tom’s analysis below shows that the number of appeals filed against the city arborists’ decisions correlates with the number of citations issued – those arborists who issue more citations tend to engender more appeals. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that Tom, being the most vigilant employee on the job, had the most number of appeals by an overwhelming margin.
The question is: Where did all Tom's appeals go after he was fired?
Comments