Skip to main content

August 16 Update from Tom Coffin

A broadcast email sent from Tom Coffin on August 16, 2008:

Friends:

I again give you my heartfelt thanks for your continuing support. I am neither optimistic nor pessimistic at this point. Much depends on the independence and integrity of the HR officer assigned to the case, Al Elder. He appears to be conducting a thorough investigation. He has agreed to look into the “plan” referenced by Commissioner Cover in his email to Mr. Maslamani, as well as to include Luz Borrero in his interview schedule. I don’t know when (or even if) he will issue a report or, if he does, whether it will be available to either the public or to me. Mr. Elder’s suggestion of a meeting between Cover, Maslamani, my supervisor Ainsley Caldwell and me has not materialized.

There is continued media interest in the case. Ch. 2 scheduled another interview last week, only to cancel so the reporter could cover the molestation case in Clayton County. Both the AJC and Creative Loafing have stories in the pipeline. The AJC article is scheduled to appear on Monday. I don’t know what CL’s publication schedule is like. The Buckhead Reporter says that they intend to continue coverage.

Both the AJC and CL have access to the documents I requested under the Open Records law and have questioned me extensively about their contents. They have also put in OR requests for documents related to the “plan,” as have I. I have also asked for additional access to documents – when the city responded to my original request they sent me a bill for 577 pages. When I went to review them the first time I was told that they had been “sent upstairs” for further review. The next day I was allowed to view 134 pages. I have asked them to produce the other 423 documents.

Mary Norwood has said that she intends to introduce a resolution for an independent investigation at the City Council meeting at 1 p.m. Monday 8/18. Interested citizens are being asked to attend. I believe that there is time allotted for input from the audience. I will include the link to the DailyKos site calling for participation. The link also includes most of the press reports to date. It is

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/14/185720/594/441/568072

Thanks again,

Tom Coffin

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Appeals to the Tree Conservation Commission, 2008

Appeals to the Tree Conservation Commission, 2008 By Tom Coffin, Ph.D. Appeals to the Tree Conservation Commission are, by design, an integral part of the Tree Protection Ordinance. Like most laws, the TPO is a relatively blunt instrument. Though reasonable and effective most of the time, it does not cover all situations all the time, nor is it fair to all parties all the time. Appeals to the TCC provide an administrative means to resolve disputes. Unlike a Municipal Court hearing – also possible under the ordinance -- where decisions are usually based on the “letter of the law,” appeal hearings before the TCC often allow for some bending of the law as written to encompass a specific situation. At its best, the TCC acts as the “conscience of the community” in its decision-making. Both the commission and the appeal process have matured. After more than eight years of use and testing, both work rather admirably when allowed to do so. Under the Tree Protection Ordinance, every decision (s...

Urban Forest Fiasco

From Creative Loafing... "Tom Coffin loves trees. And when we say he loves trees, he reaaally loves trees. The unfamiliar face – who was the city's senior arborist until he was fired July 29 – is the epicenter of the latest scandal to emanate from already embattled City Hall. The city's failure to specify why Coffin was fired (or who called for it) has led many to speculate about the cause – and jump to the conclusion that developers saw him as a threat. Even the New York Times took notice – and questioned whether Atlanta's development machine had chalked a win over the environmental community." ... more

Huffington Post Comments

The Huffington Post picked up the New York Times story as soon as it was published. Here is a comment to the article from their Web site : "well it's nice to hear that at least someone was doing their job because when I drive through this city the question that repeatedly comes to my mind is: why does atlanta even have a tree ordinance? the developers here still clear-cut old large trees then replant saplings - and given the stress that these trees are under it is highly doubtful they will ever reach the size of the ones that are being cut down.I've lived here for almost 2 decades and I continue to be appalled at what the city allows developers to get away with here. we're running out of water and they still keep handing out the building permits. we're losing our oldest and largest tress to greed and the city just keeps handing out the permits. truely this city is f-ed at this point. so I guess given that developers always get their way in this place it comes as no...