Skip to main content

CD/HR Committee Approves Audit Request

A broadcast email sent from Tom Coffin on August 26, 2008:

The Community Development/Human Resources committee of the City Council today added a new dimension to the response to my firing as Sr. Arborist. In a unanimous vote the committee approved a resolution co-sponsored by Councilmembers Mary Norwood, Anne Fauver, C.T. Martin, Joyce M. Sheperd, Ivory L. Young, Jr., Cleta Winslow, Ceasar C. Mitchell and H. Lamar Willis to “request and authorize the City Auditor through the Audit Committee to conduct an independent audit of the Arborist Division of the Bureau of Buildings, Department of Planning and Community Development.”

Not without a bit of farce, however. Ibrahim Maslamani, Director of the Bureau of Buildings, wrote the committee chair, Jim Maddox, saying “Due to the ongoing investigation by HR, we would like to postpone any public presentations on this issue until such investigation is completed.” Joyce Sheperd made the distinction between the “employment issue” of my firing before the HR department and the much broader “audit issue” before the committee.

City Attorney Robin Shahar was consulted on ground rules. She said that the request for an audit was a policy decision, not a legal decision. She suggested that given the on-going HR investigation it would not be prudent for council members to comment on my firing.
They could listen, however, and the public could say anything they wanted to say.

Several people spoke, supporting the audit and protesting my dismissal, including Sheldon Schlegman, Linda Trower and Charlotte Gillis. Leigh Bielenberg gave an emotional account of the recent destruction of her massive S. red oak to an infill developer that I had earlier stopped. I am so sorry.

There was a bit of comedy too. City Hall regular Carrie Duncan voiced his demand that I be rehired, “and he doesn’t even agree with me politically! I’m a Bush supporter and he’s a Bush basher! But he does his job, every day, every time.” I appreciate your support, Carrie.

I have asked Al Elder, the HR investigator, for an update on his two-week long (and counting) investigation. No response as yet. Mayor Shirley Franklin is at the Democratic convention this week, so I expect no decision until next week at the earliest. I am exploring legal action either if the investigation drags on too much longer or if the recommendation and decision are negative. I will keep you posted.

Tom Coffin

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Appeals to the Tree Conservation Commission, 2008

Appeals to the Tree Conservation Commission, 2008 By Tom Coffin, Ph.D. Appeals to the Tree Conservation Commission are, by design, an integral part of the Tree Protection Ordinance. Like most laws, the TPO is a relatively blunt instrument. Though reasonable and effective most of the time, it does not cover all situations all the time, nor is it fair to all parties all the time. Appeals to the TCC provide an administrative means to resolve disputes. Unlike a Municipal Court hearing – also possible under the ordinance -- where decisions are usually based on the “letter of the law,” appeal hearings before the TCC often allow for some bending of the law as written to encompass a specific situation. At its best, the TCC acts as the “conscience of the community” in its decision-making. Both the commission and the appeal process have matured. After more than eight years of use and testing, both work rather admirably when allowed to do so. Under the Tree Protection Ordinance, every decision (s...

Urban Forest Fiasco

From Creative Loafing... "Tom Coffin loves trees. And when we say he loves trees, he reaaally loves trees. The unfamiliar face – who was the city's senior arborist until he was fired July 29 – is the epicenter of the latest scandal to emanate from already embattled City Hall. The city's failure to specify why Coffin was fired (or who called for it) has led many to speculate about the cause – and jump to the conclusion that developers saw him as a threat. Even the New York Times took notice – and questioned whether Atlanta's development machine had chalked a win over the environmental community." ... more

Huffington Post Comments

The Huffington Post picked up the New York Times story as soon as it was published. Here is a comment to the article from their Web site : "well it's nice to hear that at least someone was doing their job because when I drive through this city the question that repeatedly comes to my mind is: why does atlanta even have a tree ordinance? the developers here still clear-cut old large trees then replant saplings - and given the stress that these trees are under it is highly doubtful they will ever reach the size of the ones that are being cut down.I've lived here for almost 2 decades and I continue to be appalled at what the city allows developers to get away with here. we're running out of water and they still keep handing out the building permits. we're losing our oldest and largest tress to greed and the city just keeps handing out the permits. truely this city is f-ed at this point. so I guess given that developers always get their way in this place it comes as no...