From: Linda Trower
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:29:14 -0400
To: acaldwell@atlantaga.gov
Cc: "Maslamani, Ibrahim",mnorwood , sheldon schlegman
Subject: "no trees impacted" exception
Dear Mr. Caldwell:
On June 16, 2008 a building permit (#BB200802851) was issued to 125 Blackland Rd. for the construction of a fence. The application was streamlined using the "no trees impacted" exception.
On or about July 18, 2008 this property was cited for the destruction of 14 trees. It appears the "no trees impacted" exception was not valid. Would you please explain how this happened?
Thank you,
Linda Trower
Concerned Citizen
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:29:14 -0400
To: acaldwell@atlantaga.gov
Cc: "Maslamani, Ibrahim",
Subject: "no trees impacted" exception
Dear Mr. Caldwell:
On June 16, 2008 a building permit (#BB200802851) was issued to 125 Blackland Rd. for the construction of a fence. The application was streamlined using the "no trees impacted" exception.
On or about July 18, 2008 this property was cited for the destruction of 14 trees. It appears the "no trees impacted" exception was not valid. Would you please explain how this happened?
Thank you,
Linda Trower
Concerned Citizen
Comments
http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov/2008/images/proposed/08O0486.pdf
Pay attention to the changes to the previous posting and the revised posting signage.
This was done on purpose whereby the city arborists could overlook the non-existing signage and contractor/ownwer can not be prosecuted. Ainsley however,submitted to council a toothless policy whereby the city arborist would post the signage.Problem City Arborists (namely Franklin) don't bother doing it. Nice footwork Ainsley (yes a arborist fron DC washington who had to RESIGN)
any questions reply
Gada.2004@3web.net